Why M365 License Optimization Matters More in 2026

Microsoft 365 license optimization is the structured process of aligning what your organisation pays for with what it actually uses. In theory, this is straightforward. In practice, most enterprise M365 estates drift into over-licensing within twelve to twenty-four months of an EA signature — as headcount changes, projects end, and feature adoption trails behind license entitlement.

The 2026 landscape has raised the stakes materially. Microsoft eliminated Enterprise Agreement volume discounts at Levels B, C, and D in November 2025. All organisations now start at Level A pricing, regardless of user count. The discounts that previously applied automatically based on seat volume no longer exist. Any discount must now be negotiated explicitly. At the same time, M365 list prices are rising on July 1, 2026: E3 moves from $36 to $39 per user per month, and E5 from $57 to $60. For a 10,000-seat enterprise, the compounded impact of discount tier removal plus list price increases can represent $500,000 to $1,200,000 in additional annual spend if no action is taken before renewal.

Optimization done properly offsets this increase and in many cases delivers net savings even after absorbing the price rise. The key is knowing where the waste sits and how to reclaim it.

The M365 SKU Stack: E1 Through E7

Microsoft's commercial M365 SKU ladder runs E1, E3, E5, and E7. Understanding what each tier actually delivers is the foundation of any optimization exercise.

E1 at $10 per user per month provides web and mobile Office apps, Exchange Online, Teams, and SharePoint. It carries no desktop Office install rights and no advanced security. It is appropriate for users whose primary needs are email and communication.

E3 at $36 per user per month (rising to $39 from July 2026) adds full desktop Office installs, Intune MDM, Azure AD P1, Compliance Manager, and Windows 10/11 Enterprise upgrade rights. It is the most commonly assigned tier in large enterprises and also the tier where the most overage occurs.

E5 at $57 per user per month (rising to $60) layers advanced security on top of E3: Defender for Endpoint P2, Defender for Office 365 P2, Azure AD P2 (including Privileged Identity Management), and E5 Compliance features. The jump from E3 to E5 is substantial and only justified for users who genuinely utilise the advanced security and compliance capabilities.

E7, available from May 1, 2026 at $99 per user per month, is the new top-tier SKU above E5. It bundles the full E5 capability set with Microsoft 365 Copilot ($30/user/month), the Microsoft Entra Suite ($12/user/month), and Agent 365 ($15/user/month). Purchased separately these components total $117 per user per month, so E7 delivers approximately 15 percent savings for organisations that need all four elements. Microsoft field teams are actively positioning E7 as the destination for E5 customers at renewal. Buyers should evaluate E7 carefully: it only delivers value if Copilot adoption is genuine and the Entra Suite capabilities are needed across the user population.

"The most common waste pattern we see: an organisation assigned E5 to its entire workforce at an acquisition three years ago, and 70 percent of those users have never logged into Defender, eDiscovery, or any advanced security portal."

Where Waste Actually Lives

Based on our work across 500+ enterprise licensing engagements, waste in M365 estates clusters in four recurring patterns.

Departed Employee Accounts

Licenses assigned to employees who have left the organisation are the most visible form of waste. In a 10,000-user estate, it is common to find 300 to 600 active licenses assigned to former employees whose accounts were deprovisioned in Active Directory but not reconciled against the M365 license assignment. At $36 to $57 per user per month, 400 unreclaimed licenses represents $172,800 to $273,600 in annual waste.

E5 Assigned to E3-Level Users

The second pattern is over-tiering. An audit of E5 usage frequently reveals that 30 to 50 percent of E5 users access none of the features that differentiate E5 from E3. They use Office, Teams, and Exchange — all available at E3 pricing. Downgrading these users from E5 ($57) to E3 ($36) saves $21 per user per month, or $252 per user annually. In a 5,000-user E5 estate where half are over-tiered, the annual saving is $630,000.

Duplicate Functionality

Organisations frequently pay separately for capabilities already included in their M365 subscription. Teams Phone add-ons for users whose calling plan is already covered. Third-party email archiving for users covered by Exchange Online Archiving. Standalone Intune or Defender add-ons for users already licensed at a tier that includes these features. A systematic cross-reference of add-ons against base license entitlements almost always surfaces duplicate spend.

Frontline Workers Over-Licensed

The fourth pattern is assigning E3 to frontline, shift-based, or deskless workers who need only Teams for communication and a basic productivity suite. Microsoft's F1 ($2.25/user/month) and F3 ($8/user/month) Frontline Worker plans are designed precisely for this profile. Moving 1,000 frontline workers from E3 ($36) to F3 ($8) saves $28 per user per month, or $336,000 per year.

Not sure where your M365 waste is? We can find it.

Our Microsoft licensing advisory team has completed 500+ optimization assessments across EMEA and North America.
Talk to a Microsoft EA Negotiation Specialist →

Six Optimization Actions Before Your Next Renewal

1. Run a License Utilisation Audit

The Microsoft 365 Admin Center provides basic usage reporting, but its data lags by up to 30 days and does not surface individual feature utilisation at the granularity needed for optimization decisions. Purpose-built SAM and license management tools — including Zylo, SysKit Point, and LicenseQ Hub — provide daily active usage by feature, making it straightforward to identify users who are assigned E5 but only utilising E3 features, or E3 users who could move to F3 without capability loss.

Run the audit at least 90 days before your EA True-Up or renewal date. This provides sufficient time to gather data, model the reallocation, and build the business case for downgrade or reclamation before Microsoft's renewal proposal arrives.

2. Segment Your User Population by Actual Need

The most effective optimization framework segments the user population into three tiers: power users who genuinely leverage advanced security, compliance, or AI features and warrant E5 or E7 licensing; standard information workers who need full desktop Office and core M365 services and are correctly placed at E3; and frontline or light workers who can operate at F1 or F3. Most enterprise estates have more users in the third tier than IT believes, because frontline worker counts are often held by business operations rather than IT procurement.

3. Reclaim Inactive and Orphaned Licenses

Establish a monthly process to reconcile your Microsoft license assignment list against your HR system's active employee roster. Licenses should be reclaimed within 30 days of employee departure, not at annual True-Up. In large organisations, this single operational change prevents three to six months of unnecessary spend on departed employee licenses per year.

4. Audit Add-On Licenses Against Base Entitlements

Create a matrix that maps every add-on license in your estate against the base tier entitlements of the users it is assigned to. Defender for Endpoint P1 is already included in M365 E3 — organisations that purchased it as a standalone add-on before upgrading to E3 sometimes continue paying for it. Microsoft Intune is included in E3; standalone Intune licenses assigned to E3 users represent pure duplication. This audit typically surfaces 5 to 15 percent of add-on spend as unnecessary.

5. Model E7 Honestly Before Accepting the Upsell

Microsoft's field teams are actively positioning E7 at every E5 renewal in 2026. E7's value case rests on the assumption that the organisation will achieve genuine, broad adoption of Microsoft 365 Copilot. At $99 per user per month, E7 is $39 more than E5. If Copilot adoption across the E7 population does not reach meaningful utilisation within 12 months, you will have paid for a Copilot licence that most users treat as shelfware — a pattern already documented extensively in early E5 AI add-on deployments. Model adoption realistically. Consider a limited E7 pilot before committing the full estate.

6. Negotiate Optimization Into the EA Renewal

License optimization is not only an internal exercise — it is also a negotiation lever. Entering an EA renewal with a documented analysis showing Microsoft that your organisation has 2,000 E5 users it plans to downgrade to E3 creates commercial pressure on Microsoft's team to offer incentives to retain the E5 volume. This can manifest as targeted discounts, Copilot trial commitments, or Azure credit offsets. The optimization data becomes the opening position in the renewal negotiation, not just a cost-reduction plan.

The July 2026 Price Increase: Act Before Renewal

Organisations whose EA renews after July 1, 2026 will face both the list price increase and the removal of EA volume discounts. The effective per-user cost increase for a large enterprise that previously qualified for Level B or C pricing is not 8.3 percent — it is 15 to 23 percent when the discount tier elimination is factored in. Organisations that renew before July 1, 2026 can lock in current pricing for the three-year term. If your agreement is due for renewal in the second half of 2026, model the economic value of pulling the renewal forward before the price change takes effect.

Equally, if your renewal is within the April to June window — Microsoft's fiscal Q4 — you are in the optimal negotiating position. Microsoft's field representatives have maximum incentive to close deals before June 30, when their fiscal year ends. Deals signed in Q4 consistently achieve better discounts and more favourable commercial terms than deals signed in other quarters.

Stay Current on Microsoft 365 Licensing

Pricing and packaging changes in 2026 are moving fast. Subscribe to receive quarterly updates on M365 licensing, EA negotiation strategy, and optimization frameworks.

What Changes at Renewal for M365 Buyers in 2026

Microsoft 365 license optimization is not a one-time project — it is an ongoing operational discipline that should run continuously between EA renewals and intensify in the 90 days before each True-Up. The combination of rising list prices, eliminated volume discounts, and expanding SKU complexity in 2026 makes the optimization window before renewal more valuable than it has been at any point since Microsoft's first M365 price increase in 2022.

The practical priorities are: audit utilisation at feature level, not just seat level; segment users by genuine capability need across the E1, E3, E5, E7, F1, and F3 tiers; reclaim departed employee licenses monthly; cross-reference add-ons against base entitlements; evaluate E7 with realistic Copilot adoption assumptions; and use the resulting data as commercial leverage in the EA renewal negotiation.

Organisations that approach the 2026 renewal cycle with this kind of structured analysis consistently achieve 20 to 40 percent reductions in M365 spend — even as list prices rise. Our Microsoft EA advisory specialists team works exclusively on the buyer side and has delivered this outcome across hundreds of enterprise engagements. For a broader view of Microsoft licensing topics, explore the Microsoft Knowledge Hub.

In one engagement, a global logistics company with 12,000 M365 seats had 3,400 users assigned E5 who had never accessed Defender, eDiscovery, or any advanced compliance feature. Redress rightsized those users to E3, reclaimed 680 departed-employee licences, and negotiated the renewal. Total annual saving: $2.1M against the pre-engagement baseline. The advisory fee was less than 4% of documented savings.
MA
Morten Andersen
Co-Founder, Redress Compliance

Morten Andersen is a Co-Founder of Redress Compliance and a specialist in Microsoft Enterprise Agreement negotiation, M365 license optimization, and EA True-Up strategy. He has led 200+ Microsoft licensing engagements across EMEA and North America, working exclusively on the buyer side. Redress Compliance is Gartner recognised and has completed 500+ enterprise software licensing engagements.

Connect on LinkedIn →