What is a Microsoft Licensing Usage Review Template?

15-25% of Microsoft licenses in a typical enterprise go completely unused — yet most organisations only discover this when Microsoft's field team arrives with renewal paperwork and an upsell proposal. A structured usage review template gives you the data to push back: a repeatable method to understand your true license position, identify unused or underutilized seats, and enter renewal negotiations with hard evidence rather than guesswork.

Enterprise organizations often accumulate software licenses over time—through mergers, departmental purchases, pilot projects, and expansions. Without a formal review process, many licenses go completely unused while others are assigned to users who never touch the application. This creates two problems: wasted spend on licenses you don't need, and missed opportunities to downgrade or cancel products entirely.

The template provides a repeatable, auditable method to answer critical questions: Which users are actually using their M365 E5 licenses? How many Azure subscriptions are dormant? Is our Dynamics 365 deployment delivering ROI? Armed with this evidence, you can negotiate renewals with confidence and typically achieve 10-20% savings through optimization.

Why Every Enterprise Needs a Usage Review Before Renewal

Microsoft renewals happen fast. Your EA renewal window typically opens 120 days before expiration, and Microsoft field teams—armed with consumption data from your M365 Admin Center—will push for upgrades: from E1 to E3, E3 to E5, and increasingly from E5 to the new E7 tier (which bundles in Microsoft Copilot at $30/user/month).

Without your own usage data, you are negotiating blind. Microsoft's discount terms have tightened: standard EA discounts are now 10-20%, down from historical 15-25%. For NCE (New Commerce Experience) pricing, monthly commitments come at list price with zero discount, while annual commitments offer up to 5% off. That means every renewal is an opportunity to compress costs through right-sizing.

The template workflow ensures you:

  • Own your data: Pull usage from M365 Admin Center, Azure Cost Management, Intune, and ServiceNow, not just Microsoft's claims
  • Spot shelfware: Identify E5 compliance features (Advanced Threat Protection, eDiscovery) that sit unused and should never have been purchased
  • Quantify savings: Document exactly how many seats can be downgraded, cancelled, or consolidated
  • Negotiate confidently: Present your Effective License Position (ELP) document to Microsoft, showing exactly what you'll keep and what you'll cut
  • Set a baseline: Compare this year's usage to last year's to prove or disprove adoption trends

Ready to optimize your Microsoft licenses?

Download the template and consolidate your license position before renewal discussions begin.
Download Template

What the Template Covers: 8 Product Categories

The template is organized by product family, with dedicated sections for each major Microsoft workload:

1. Microsoft 365 (M365) / Office 365

The core SKU stack: E1 → E3 → E5 → E7. E7 is the new premium tier, launching with advanced AI and Copilot bundled in. The template tracks license counts for each tier, maps them to actual users in the M365 Admin Center, and identifies inactive mailboxes or unlicensed users.

2. Azure Subscriptions

Azure licensing is consumption-based, but the template helps you identify long-running, underutilized VMs, orphaned storage accounts, and idle databases. Enterprise customers often commit to Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC), so the template helps track utilization against commitment thresholds.

3. Dynamics 365

Dynamics 365 seats are often purchased upfront but adoption lags. The template maps licensed users to actual logins, identifies administrators vs. functional end-users, and recommends downgrade paths (e.g., Sales Pro to Sales Team Members for light users).

4. Power Platform (Power Apps, Power Automate, Power BI)

These products frequently show low adoption rates in the first 18 months post-purchase. The template pulls app usage metrics and identifies which Power Apps or Power Automate flows are actually being used—critical data before your Power BI licensing renewal.

5. Windows Server & SQL Server

On-premises infrastructure licensing, tracked by server deployments in Endpoint Manager or CMDB. The template identifies servers past end-of-support and quantifies the cost of migration vs. continued licensing.

6. Teams Phone (formerly Skype for Business Online)

Teams Phone licensing is granular and easy to overprovision. The template inventories active calling users, identifies seats assigned to non-calling roles, and recommends consolidation.

7. GitHub Copilot, Visual Studio, & Developer Tools

Growing spend on developer tooling often goes unchecked. The template tracks GitHub Copilot seats (often conflated with M365 E5 or E7 which already include Copilot), Visual Studio Professional/Enterprise subscriptions, and other tools.

8. Microsoft Copilot & AI Add-ons

Microsoft Copilot licenses at $30/user/month outside of E7 are increasingly negotiated in renewals. The template helps you track which users genuinely need Copilot access and which can benefit from built-in M365 AI features in E5/E7.

How to Gather the Data: Sources and Tools

The template is only as good as your data. Here's where to pull usage metrics for each product:

  • M365 Admin Center → Reports → User Activity: Shows mailbox activity, OneDrive usage, Teams logins, and SharePoint engagement for the past 90 days. Export as CSV and match against your licensed user list.
  • Azure Cost Management: Pull consumption reports, identify zero-spend resources, and cross-reference against your MACC commitment.
  • Intune Device Management: Lists all Intune-enrolled devices and which users own them; compare against your Intune license count.
  • ServiceNow CMDB or Cherwell: If you maintain a server/software CMDB, export all Windows Server and SQL Server entries to validate licensing.
  • HR System (Workday, SAP SuccessFactors): Sync your current headcount and departmental assignment to create a baseline of users who should be licensed. Compare to actual license assignments.
  • GitHub Admin Dashboard: Lists all GitHub Copilot seats provisioned and which developers are active users.
  • Power Platform Admin Center: Shows Power Apps and Power Automate flows and which teams own them.

Recommended review cadence: Quarterly for spot-checks, annual deep-dive 6 months before renewal.

Template Structure: Column-by-Column Walkthrough

The core template layout includes these columns:

  • Product / SKU: E.g., "M365 E5", "Azure VM Standard", "Dynamics 365 Sales Pro"
  • License Count Owned: How many seats you currently hold (from your invoice or EA statement)
  • Active Users / Deployed: From the respective admin portals, how many users logged in or accessed the service in the review period (e.g., last 90 days)
  • Inactive / Unassigned: License Count Owned minus Active Users—these are your optimization targets
  • Usage Rate (%): Active Users / License Count Owned. A 70% rate is healthy; below 50% signals overprovisioning
  • Cost Per License (Annual): From your EA or invoice, the blended cost after discounts
  • Total Annual Cost: License Count Owned × Cost Per License
  • Optimization Opportunity: Inactive Count × Cost Per License—the dollar amount you can save if you cancel unused seats
  • Renewal Recommendation: Keep, Reduce, Upgrade, or Cancel based on usage trend and business alignment
  • Notes / Owner: Department, business justification, or migration blockers
"Enterprises with a structured usage review save 10-20% at renewal through optimization. Without one, Microsoft defaults you to the tier and quantity they sold you last year."

How to Interpret the Findings

Once the template is populated, three patterns emerge:

High Usage (75%+): These SKUs are justified and should be renewed as-is. If adoption is trending upward, you may even need to add seats.

Moderate Usage (50-75%): Normal for enterprise—some turnover, some pilot projects. These are safe to renew but review for downgrade opportunities. For example, if only 60% of your E5 users actually need advanced compliance features, migrate the rest to E3.

Low Usage (below 50%): This is your negotiation leverage. Document the inactive seats, prepare a business case for either driving adoption or cancellation, and present it to Microsoft. Expect pushback from your field team, but the data usually prevails.

Zero Usage: Immediate cancellation candidate. Examples: an Azure subscription that never launched, a Power BI premium capacity with no users, a Teams Phone rollout that didn't get adopted. Cancel before renewal to avoid another year of spend.

Typical findings in a 500-1000 user enterprise:

  • 15-25% of M365 licenses go completely unused (expired employees, role changes, acquisitions)
  • E5 shelfware is common: Advanced Threat Protection, eDiscovery Pro, and Copilot features included but rarely activated
  • 5-10% of Azure committed spend goes to orphaned resources (old dev/test environments, abandoned migrations)
  • Dynamics 365 pilot projects often stall at 30-40% adoption, leading to recommendations to downgrade or pause

Using the Template Output in Renewal Negotiations

Once you've completed the template, distill it into an Effective License Position (ELP) document—a one-page summary for your renewal discussion with Microsoft or your licensing reseller.

The ELP should state:

  • Total current spend by product
  • Usage metrics (active rate, trend)
  • Recommended changes (e.g., "Reduce M365 E5 by 150 seats, upgrade 50 E1 to E3, cancel dormant Azure subscription")
  • Projected new spend
  • Negotiation ask (e.g., "We expect EA discounts of 15% on all product lines given the volume and multi-year commitment")

Armed with this document, you shift the conversation from "What should we buy?" to "Here's what we're optimizing to; what's your best price?" This typically yields 10-20% total savings and prevents upsells to E5 or E7 for users who don't need them.

Download Your License Review Template Today

Get access to the complete template, data gathering worksheet, and interpretation guide. Perfect for quarterly reviews or preparing for your next renewal negotiation.

Download and Implementation Tips

Getting Started: The template comes as an Excel spreadsheet with pre-built formulas for Usage Rate, Optimization Opportunity, and cost calculations. Simply update the License Count Owned and Active Users columns with your data; the rest auto-calculates.

Data Accuracy: Spend time pulling accurate usage reports. If you don't trust your M365 Admin Center data, run a sampling audit (manually log in as 50 users and verify their Teams activity). Inaccurate data weakens your negotiation position.

Cross-Functional Alignment: Before you present findings to Microsoft, circulate the template to your IT operations, procurement, and business unit heads. You'll identify dependencies, blockers, and hidden usage that admin portals don't reveal.

Frequency: Complete a full review at least once per year, ideally 6 months before your EA or MCA renewal date. Run lighter quarterly spot-checks to catch new unused licenses early.

Archiving: Keep copies of past reviews. Year-over-year comparison is gold: it proves whether your "reduce by 100 E5 seats" plan actually happened or whether users re-requested upgrades.

Conclusion: Turn Data Into Savings

Microsoft licensing reviews are not a one-time exercise. Competitors will always try to sell you the next tier (E5 to E7, standard to premium Dynamics). A structured usage template empowers you to say "no" with confidence and "yes" only where usage justifies it.

The template takes 90 minutes to set up and 2-3 hours quarterly to populate. Over a three-year EA, the insights you'll uncover typically save 15-25% of total spend—often six figures for mid-market and enterprise customers.

Ready to get control of your Microsoft licenses? Download the template and run your first review today. Our Microsoft EA negotiation specialists can also walk your team through the process and help interpret findings for your renewal.

MA
Morten Andersen
Co-Founder, Redress Compliance
Morten Andersen is a Co-Founder of Redress Compliance and a specialist in Microsoft Enterprise Agreement negotiation, True-Up strategy, and M365 licensing optimisation. He has led 200+ Microsoft EA engagements across EMEA and North America, working exclusively on the buyer side. Redress Compliance is Gartner recognised and has completed 500+ enterprise software licensing engagements.
Visit LinkedIn Profile →